Flow of Funds · Compare
Compare payment rails, side by side
Decision mode: a vendor-neutral, side-by-side look at rails that genuinely compete (same market, same job). We do not pit incomparable rails against each other (no ACH vs Pix). Each comparison shows both flows, a diff of the attributes that matter, and one line on when you would pick each.
Educational, plain-English explainers. Not legal, compliance, tax, or financial advice. These cover fundamentals, not current fees, limits, or rates (which change). Rails and parties vary by program and country, so verify specifics against primary sources. Last reviewed June 2026.
FedNow vs RTP
United StatesSend an instant, irrevocable credit-push payment between US banks
Both settle in seconds; the split is the settlement model. FedNow settles directly across each bank's Federal Reserve master account, while RTP settles by moving positions inside a prefunded joint account at the FRBNY (so RTP participants carry the liquidity burden of keeping that position funded).
See the comparisonACH vs RTP
United StatesMove USD between US bank accounts (e.g. a business or payroll payment)
Pick ACH when batch and low cost win (entries clear end-of-day and settle across Fed accounts on the settlement date); pick RTP when the payment must be instant and final, credit-push only, settled in seconds via the prefunded joint account.
See the comparisonInterac e-Transfer vs the Real-Time Rail
CanadaMove CAD account-to-account between two Canadian banks in (near) real time
Interac e-Transfer is the live incumbent (alias-based, credited in seconds, with deferred net interbank settlement). The Real-Time Rail is the planned successor that settles in central bank money at the Bank of Canada in real time, but it has NOT launched (Payments Canada targets a late-Q4-2026 go-live and the date has slipped), so today the e-Transfer is the one you can actually send.
See the comparisonLynx vs ACSS / EFT
CanadaClear and settle a CAD interbank payment through Payments Canada
Pick Lynx for high-value, time-critical wires that must be final immediately (real-time gross settlement, each payment irrevocable in central bank money, no inter-participant credit risk); pick ACSS / EFT for everyday retail batch items (direct deposits, PADs) that exchange in batches and settle on a deferred multilateral NET basis the next business day.
See the comparisonCA prepaid program vs US neobank program
Canada vs United States (two BaaS structures)Run a sponsor-bank card program where a fintech owns the UX and the bank is issuer of record
Same BaaS shape on both sides (a fintech program manager owns the UX and ledger, a sponsor bank is issuer of record and holds cardholder funds in an FBO account, settlement runs bank-to-bank). The differences are jurisdiction and structure: a Canadian Schedule I prepaid program (OSFI / FCAC) versus a US neobank debit program (OCC / CFPB) that also carries a program-manager-funded reserve to collateralize program losses.
See the comparison
Want a different angle?
The studio draws any single flow from plain English, and the guides walk each rail through step by step.